Understanding and Configuring PPP CHAP Authentication

Introduction
The Challenge Handshake Authentication Protocol (CHAP) (defined in RFC 1994 ) verifies the identity of the peer by means of a three-way handshake. These are the general steps performed in CHAP:

After the LCP (Link Control Protocol) phase is complete, and CHAP is negotiated between both devices, the authenticator sends a challenge message to the peer.

The peer responds with a value calculated through a one-way hash function (Message Digest 5 (MD5)).

The authenticator checks the response against its own calculation of the expected hash value. If the values match, the authentication is successful. Otherwise, the connection is terminated.

This authentication method depends on a "secret" known only to the authenticator and the peer. The secret is not sent over the link. Although the authentication is only one-way, you can negotiate CHAP in both directions, with the help of the same secret set for mutual authentication.

For more information on the advantages and disadvantages of CHAP, refer to RFC 1994 .

Requirements
Readers of this document should have knowledge of these topics:

How to enable PPP on the interface through the encapsulation ppp command.

The debug ppp negotiation command output. Refer to Understanding debug ppp negotiation Output for more information.

Ability to troubleshoot when the Link Control Protocol (LCP) phase is not in the open state. This is because, the PPP authentication phase does not begin until the LCP phase is complete and is in the open state. If the debug ppp negotiation command does not indicate that LCP is open, you need to troubleshoot this issue before you proceed.

Note: This document does not address MS-CHAP (Version 1 or Version 2). For more information on MS-CHAP, refer to the MS-CHAP Support and MSCHAP Version 2 documents.

Configure CHAP
The procedure to configure CHAP is fairly straightforward. For example, assume that you have two routers, left and right, connected across a network, as shown in figure 1.

Figure 1 – Two Routers Connected Across a Network



To configure CHAP authentication, complete these steps:

On the interface, issue the encapsulation ppp command.

Enable the use of CHAP authentication on both routers with the ppp authentication chap command.

Configure the usernames and passwords. To do so, issue the username username password password command, where username is the hostname of the peer. Ensure that:

Passwords are identical at both ends.

The router name and password are exactly the same, because they are case-sensitive.

Note: By default, the router uses its hostname to identify itself to the peer. However, this CHAP username can be changed through the ppp chap hostname command. Refer to PPP Authentication Using the ppp chap hostname and ppp authentication chap callin Commands for more information.

One-Way and Two-Way Authentication
CHAP is defined as a one-way authentication method. However, you use CHAP in both directions to create a two-way authentication. Hence, with two-way CHAP, a separate three-way handshake is initiated by each side.

In the Cisco CHAP implementation, by default, the called party must authenticate the calling party (unless authentication is completely turned off). Therefore, a one-way authentication initiated by the called party is the minimum possible authentication. However, the calling party can also verify the identity of the called party, and this results in a two-way authentication.

One-way authentication is often required when you connect to non-Cisco devices.

For one-way authentication, configure the ppp authentication chap callin command on the calling router.

Transactional Example
The diagrams in this section show the series of events that occur during a CHAP authentication between two routers. These do not represent the actual messages seen in the debug ppp negotiation command output. For more information, refer to Understanding debug ppp negotiation Output.

Call
Figure 2 – The Call Comes In


Figure 2 shows these steps:

The call comes in to 3640-1. The incoming interface is configured with the ppp authentication chap command.

LCP negotiates CHAP and MD5. For more information on how to determine this, refer to Understanding the debug ppp negotiation Output.

A CHAP challenge from 3640-1 to the calling router is required on this call.

Challenge
Figure 3 – A CHAP Challenge Packet is Built


Figure 3 illustrates these steps in the CHAP authentication between the two routers:

A CHAP challenge packet is built with these characteristics:

01 = challenge packet type identifier.

ID = sequential number that identifies the challenge.

random = a reasonably random number generated by the router.

3640-1 = the authentication name of the challenger.

The ID and random values are kept on the called router.

The challenge packet is sent to the calling router. A list of outstanding challenges is maintained.

Response
Figure 4 – Receipt and MD5 Processing of the Challenge Packet from the Peer


Figure 4 illustrates the how the challenge packet is received from the peer, and processed (MD5). The router processes the incoming CHAP challenge packet in this way:

The ID value is fed into the MD5 hash generator.

The random value is fed into the MD5 hash generator.

The name 3640-1 is used to look up the password. The router looks for an entry that matches the username in the challenge. In this example, it looks for:

username 3640-1 password pc1The password is fed into the MD5 hash generator.

The result is the one-way MD5-hashed CHAP challenge that is sent back in the CHAP response.

Response (continued)
Figure 5 – The CHAP Response Packet Sent to the Authenticator is Built.


Figure 5 illustrates how the CHAP response packet sent to the authenticator is built. This diagram shows these steps:

The response packet is assembled from these components:

02 = CHAP response packet type identifier.

ID = copied from the challenge packet.

hash = the output from the MD5 hash generator (the hashed information from the challenge packet).

766-1 = the authentication name of this device. This is needed for the peer to look up the username and password entry needed to verify identity (this is explained in more detail in the Verify CHAP section).

The response packet is then sent to the challenger.

Verify CHAP
This section provides tips on how to verify your configuration.

Figure 6 – The Challenger Processes the Response Packet


Figure 6 shows how the challenger processes the response packet. Here are the steps involved when the CHAP response packet is processed (on the authenticator):

The ID is used to find the original challenge packet.

The ID is fed into the MD5 hash generator.

The original challenge random value is fed into the MD5 hash generator.

The name 766-1 is used to look up the password from one of these sources:

Local username and password database.

RADIUS or TACACS+ server.

The password is fed into the MD5 hash generator.

The hash value received in the response packet is then compared with the calculated MD5 hash value. CHAP authentication succeeds if the calculated and the received hash values are equal.

Result
Figure 7 – Success Message is Sent to the Calling Router


Figure 7 illustrates the success message sent to the calling router. It involves these steps:

If authentication is successful, a CHAP success packet is built from these components:

03 = CHAP success message type.

ID = copied from the response packet.

“Welcome in” is simply a text message that provides a user-readable explanation.

If authentication fails, a CHAP failure packet is built from these components:

04 = CHAP failure message type.

ID = copied from the response packet.

“Authentication failure” or other text message, that provides a user-readable explanation.

The success or failure packet is then sent to the calling router.

Note: This example depicts a one-way authentication. In a two-way authentication, this entire process is repeated. However the calling router initiates the initial challenge.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

TCP/IP 明確擁塞通知 (ECN)

集中式數位交換機(CENTREX)系統

WRR(Weighted Round Robin) vs SRR(Shared/Shaped Round Robin)